Wednesday, January 27, 2010

2010 State of the Union



Obama’s first State of the Union was a success.  As in, he kept my attention for an entire hour, although the competitive State of the Union Bingo card was partially responsible.  Of course, I always want to win, so I paid extra close attention. 

High Points:

1.    High Speed Trains.  It’s about time we caught up to the rest of the world.  Plus, Chris loves trains.
2.    Chris got blue ink all over his mouth from biting his pen 10 minutes into the speech.  We paused Tivo so he could wash his mouth out.
3.    Michele Obama looked great in her eggplant outfit.  And I still love how they interact as a married couple in public.  The winks and the comments like, “she gets embarrassed” continue to be endearing.
4.    Education.  Education.  Education.
5.    To be the global leader in clean energy is to be the global economic leader – who cares if you don’t believe in the science.
6.    Asking universities to cut their own costs.
7.    Repealing “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”
8.    Scolding the House and Senate (on both sides) like children for being petty and holding grudges.  “I win.  You lose.” 
9.    Joe Biden’s badly timed half clap.  

Chris won the Bingo card with “Bipartisan Commission for X”

Avoiding Pesticides

I love to eat the pestiest foods and so does Henry.  I fear I’ve already done myself irreparable harm, considering I can eat an entire bushel of apples or peaches (the 2 pestiest fruits around) in a day.  I can still feel the canker sores from 3 years ago when I ate an entire bushel of apples on our drive back from Door County -- cheers to our road trip buddies CBG and AG who just moved to NYC.  There is still a chance for my little Henry, though!  Researching pesticides can be a little scary, but now I know that washing with water is not sufficient.  I’m definitely going to be more vigilant about buying organic when feasible.  I’m also going to start using baking soda, the affordable alternative to fruit wash sprays, to wash my fruits and veggies.  I can't wait for our summer CSA (community share agriculture) to begin!

Infants and children may be especially sensitive to health risks posed by pesticides for several reasons:

1.  Their internal organs are still developing and maturing
2.  In relation to their body weight, infants and children eat and drink more than adults, possibly increasing their exposure to pesticides in food and water.
3.  Certain behaviors--such as playing on floors or lawns or putting objects in their mouths--increase a child's exposure to pesticides used in homes and yards.

Pesticides may harm a developing child by blocking the absorption of important food nutrients necessary for normal healthy growth. Another way pesticides may cause harm is if a child's excretory system is not fully developed, the body may not fully remove pesticides. Also, there are "critical periods" in human development when exposure to a toxin can permanently alter the way an individual's biological system operates.
For these reasons, and as specifically required under the Food Quality Protection Act (1996), EPA carefully evaluates children's exposure to pesticide residues in and on foods they most commonly eat, i.e., apples and apple juice, orange juice, potatoes, tomatoes, soybean oil, sugar, eggs, pork, chicken and beef. EPA is also evaluating new and existing pesticides to ensure that they can be used with a reasonable certainty of no harm to adults as well as infants and children. 

What is organic?
"Organically grown" food is food grown and processed using no synthetic fertilizers or pesticides. Pesticides derived from natural sources (e.g., biological pesticides) may also be used in producing organically grown food. Increasingly, some consumers are purchasing organically grown and processed foods as a way to reduce their exposure to synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. Many supermarkets now stock organic products for their consumers. Ask your grocer about organic food and its availability at your store.

Because pesticides have many uses, we may be exposed to them in a variety of ways -- through food, water, and air.  You may reduce the amount of pesticides you consume by:

EPA Best Practices

WASHING:  Wash and scrub all fresh fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water. Running water has an abrasive effect that soaking does not have. This will help remove bacteria and traces of chemicals from the surface of fruits vegetables and dirt from crevices. Not all pesticide residues can be removed by washing.




PEELING and TRIMMING:  Peel fruits and vegetables when possible to reduce dirt, bacteria, and pesticides.  Discard outer leaves of leafy vegetables.  Trim fat from meat and skin from poultry and fish because some pesticides residues collect in fat.
SELECTING A VARIETY OF FOODS:  Eat a variety of foods from a variety of sources. This will give you a better mix of nutrients and reduce your likelihood of exposure to a single pesticide. 

Foods with the highest concentration of pesticides in alphabetical order – add meat, milk and coffee to your organic grocery list

Apples
Carrots
Celery
Cherries
Collard Greens
Imported grapes
Kale
Lettuce
Nectarines
Peaches
Pears
Potatoes
Red raspberries
Spinach
Strawberries
Sweet bell peppers

Least contaminated foods in alphabetical order: 

Asparagus
Avocados
Bananas
Broccoli
Cabbage
Cauliflower
Eggplant
Sweet corn
Kiwi
Mangos
Onions
Papaya
Pineapples
Sweet peas
Sweet potato
Tomato
Watermelon

See the following links for more information

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Adopting from Haiti



On January 12, 2010, the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere was hit with a 7.0 earthquake.    Before the earthquake there were approximately 380,000 orphaned children.  With the estimated death toll ranging from 100,000 to 150,000, the number of children without parents is expected to reach over a million. See http://www.haitiadoption.org/

There are potential adoptive parents coming out of the woodwork, hoping to give a warm and safe home to Haitian orphans, but new adoption applications have been frozen.  Many fear that abandoned children still have surviving relatives.  The U.S. has, however, waived visa requirements for children already in the adoption process, totaling 50 Haitian orphans.  

We can only hope that this outpouring of love and generosity continues once the adoption ban is lifted.

Please find below a few links with more information on adoption.

    

Monday, January 25, 2010

Earwax Gene



Before Henry was born we wondered whom he would most resemble.  We wondered if he would have my eyes or if he would have Chris’ height.  We wondered if he’d have crooked teeth like I have or bad gas like Chris has.  But we never thought, "I wonder which kind of earwax he will have."

For those of you who don’t know, Asians and Caucasians have dramatically different earwax.  Those of East Asian descent have dry and flaky earwax – like fish food.  Europeans and Africans have wet and gooey ear wax – like hot drippy caramel.  Southern Asians and Central Asians can have either type.  In January 2006, the New York Times reported that Japanese scientists have discovered the earwax gene.  

The study found that wet earwax was most likely the ancestral form before humans left Africa 50,000 years ago.  Researchers believe that the dry form of earwax, like less sweating, small nostrils and the fold of fat above the eyelid, was an adaptation to the cold climate.  

If you’re wondering which gene your kids will have, the wet earwax gene is dominant.  Therefore, your child will only have dry earwax if both parents carry the dry earwax gene.  Alas, this study has crushed my dreams of passing on the dry earwax gene.  

Friday, January 22, 2010

Favorite First Year Videos

I just figured out how to post videos from youtube today. Thanks to my Tech Crunch guru, Leena Rao! She's so great at simplifying complex techy stuff for people like me who are getting old, but want to be hip and with it.  Below are my favorite videos showing the progression of Henry's first year.


One of Henry's first videos. I miss that teeny tiny stage where the poos and pees were so cute.


My Ahma (grandmother), Henry's Atso (great grandmother), saying that he's fatter than I am.


Dadda teaching Henry to laugh like a true nerd.


He loved his first swing ride.


Showing off his crawling and high fiving skillz.


Sitting in the snow on our roof deck. He's so bundled up he can't move, but he still smiles for Momma.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

When is the right time to stop breastfeeding: 6 months; 1 year; 4; 6 or 10?

The choice is dependent on individual mothers and babies.  I pass no judgment on mothers who choose to nurse long term, but take a look at the photo below.  Where is the mother's udder?  I mean nipple?  Many mothers in America avoid breastfeeding because they are afraid of having saggy tribal breasts.  See NPR story on teaching black women to embrace breastfeeding.

I wonder if nursing a child until he/she is 4, 5 or 6 is healthy for a marital relationship.  In my experience, when my breasts belonged to my son, I was much less interested in passing them off to my husband for less nutritional purposes.  Perhaps mothers around the world, especially in the third world, nurse long term because access to a balanced diet is limited.  Nursing is a serious commitment a mother makes to her child, and it slaps imaginary handcuffs on mother and baby.  I happily and proudly nursed Henry for 1 year.  Upon the 1 year mark we were both ready to stop.  He became uninterested, and I was ready to have my freedom back.  Breast feeding is a very sensitive subject for mothers, and it is an individual mother's choice to pursue it or not.  Either way, I respect every mother's right to choose how to feed her baby as long as she is educated on what is and isn't beneficial for her child.  


When a Bay Area mom, who we'll call Jennifer, was pregnant, she took a breastfeeding class at Kaiser. Jennifer learned all about how your milk supply is established, positioning, and latch. She also learned that on average mothers throughout the world breastfeed their children until age 4.


Shutterstock/Anita Patterson Peppers

Jennifer didn't take this fact too seriously and assumed that she'd try to breastfeed her child until he turned 1. That's what the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends after all.
But when Jennifer's son was still happily nursing at 1 year old, she decided to keep on going until he showed signs of wanting to stop. She realized that breastfeeding provides a wonderful opportunity for mother and child to cuddle and bond. At this point, Jennifer took great comfort in knowing that women throughout the world breastfeed their children well past the baby stage.
Jennifer continued to nurse her son, and didn't stop until he was 4 years old and told her, "I don't need this anymore."
Of course, he wanted mommy's milk the next day but she decided that it was time to wean him.
Breastfeeding a child until he is age 4 is unusual in the United States. Only 23 percent of women make it until age 1, according to the Centers for Disease Control. It's simply not part of American culture to nurse a toddler.
Jennifer was aware that long-term breastfeeding is considered taboo, and so she didn't freely share that she was still nursing her 3-year-old son in the morning and at night before bedtime. She only told friends who she figured wouldn't criticize her. "I knew I was getting into weirdo land for a lot of people," she says.
She only breastfed in her home and told her son to keep quiet about it. "When he was about 3 years old, I remember having a discussion between the two of us," Jennifer says. "I told him that what we're doing is private and we don't need to talk about it outside the house."
While Jennifer was secretive, a mom in the United Kingdom is sharing with the world that she breastfed her daughter until she was six and a half years old in her new book Breastfeeding Older Children.
For her book, Ann Sinnott of Cambridge corresponded via email with women, men and children from nearly 50 countries, and she found that breastfeeding until a child is three, six, nine, or even 11 is a growing phenomenon, according to Irish Independent.
Sinnott says her book is intended to reach out to women who are breastfeeding their toddlers and let them know that they're not alone and that they don't need to nurse behind closed doors. She is advocating for moms to allow their children to choose when breastfeeding ceases; some call this child-led breastfeeding.
Sinnott also hopes to challenge the negative perceptions of many psychologists who contend that breastfed older children are emotionally damaged.
Earlier this month a mom named Robyn Paul appeared on ABC News to talk about breastfeeding all three of her children longterm, and a psychologist questioned what she's doing. Will Braun told ABC that he isn't so sure and he wonders whether it's appropriate from a developmental standpoint.
"I think a child really needs to learn to develop the capacity to soothe oneself, the capacity to tolerate frustration," Braun said. "When a child is constantly given a breast, it might thwart that from happening."
But Paul doesn't think this is the case. On the news show she shared that breastfeeding her children has created a special bond between them.
"I really feel that there is an extra bonding or attachment there that I would like to think that because he nursed until he was 6, that there was some more closeness there ... that you get when you're able to have him in your arms for a longer period of time," Paul said. "My daughter's the same way. Very much so."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=55598&tsp=1#ixzz0dCRMMjok


Cord Blood Banking

We did not choose to do cord blood banking.  The doctor handed us the fliers early on, but it was the last thing on my mind during the pregnancy.  By the time I got around to thinking about it I had run out of time to prepare the paperwork for donation. 

What is cord blood banking?

Umbilical cord blood stem cells can be used in transplants to treat a variety of pediatric disorders including leukemia, sickle cell disease, and metabolic disorders.  There is no scientific data to support that transplantation is effective from the donor back to the donor. 

Why would you pursue private cord blood banking? 
The American Academy of Pediatrics (“AAP”) recommends “private cord blood banking for [those] who have an older child with a condition that could potentially benefit from transplantation, such as a genetic immunodeficiency.” 

Why wouldn’t you pursue private cord blood banking?
The AAP also notes “families may be vulnerable to emotional marketing at the time of birth of a child ...”  In fact, the research estimates are so unreliable that the possibility that your child will need a cord blood transplant is anywhere from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 200,000.

Another reason not to pursue private cord blood banking is that the high costs outweigh the benefits.  First-year fees can range from $595 to $1,835, depending on which private bank you choose. Annual storage fees are usually about $95.

What happens to donated cord blood?
Public cord blood banking, or donating, means that the baby's cord blood is stored in a cord blood bank and is available to anyone in need of a transplant or may be used research purposes.

See AAP.com for more information on how to donate cord blood.